tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2759480248865232582.post5294729629607279932..comments2009-11-17T15:14:57.932+11:00Chris Mountfordhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03560327085364406517noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2759480248865232582.post-48690513446478776632009-11-17T15:14:57.932+11:002009-11-17T15:14:57.932+11:00I think you completely misunderstand the point of my blog post. I&#39;ll briefly follow your tangent.<br /><br />No discussion of success can possibly make sense without reference to a goal.<br /><br />You certainly make no reference to their goals. It seems to me that the 37 Signals guys are 100% successful in achieving their goals.Chris Mountfordhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03560327085364406517noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2759480248865232582.post-56413257694734814312009-11-17T15:02:14.826+11:002009-11-17T15:02:14.826+11:00The Inc. article mentions that there are 16 people in the company and 2 people providing support. How many paying customers does that translate to? More complex solutions are destroying them in the market place. The only conclusion is if you want a niche market of people with the same (supposedly) good taste be like 37 signals.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com